🔗 Share this article

These times exhibit a very unusual occurrence: the pioneering US procession of the overseers. They vary in their skills and characteristics, but they all possess the same goal – to prevent an Israeli breach, or even destruction, of Gaza’s unstable peace agreement. After the conflict concluded, there have been rare occasions without at least one of Donald Trump’s delegates on the scene. Just this past week saw the presence of a senior advisor, Steve Witkoff, JD Vance and Marco Rubio – all appearing to carry out their duties.

The Israeli government keeps them busy. In only a few short period it launched a wave of operations in Gaza after the killings of a pair of Israeli military personnel – leading, based on accounts, in many of local injuries. Multiple ministers demanded a restart of the war, and the Knesset approved a initial resolution to incorporate the West Bank. The US reaction was somehow between “no” and “hell no.”

But in various respects, the US leadership appears more intent on upholding the present, uneasy stage of the peace than on progressing to the next: the reconstruction of Gaza. When it comes to this, it looks the US may have goals but no tangible proposals.

Currently, it remains unclear when the planned global administrative entity will truly take power, and the same goes for the proposed peacekeeping troops – or even the composition of its personnel. On a recent day, Vance declared the United States would not impose the composition of the international unit on the Israeli government. But if the prime minister's administration keeps to reject multiple options – as it did with the Turkish suggestion lately – what happens then? There is also the opposite issue: which party will decide whether the troops preferred by Israel are even prepared in the mission?

The matter of the duration it will need to neutralize Hamas is just as ambiguous. “The aim in the leadership is that the international security force is going to now take charge in neutralizing Hamas,” said Vance lately. “It’s will require a period.” Trump only reinforced the ambiguity, saying in an discussion on Sunday that there is no “fixed” timeline for Hamas to lay down arms. So, theoretically, the unidentified participants of this not yet established global contingent could deploy to the territory while Hamas members continue to hold power. Are they dealing with a leadership or a guerrilla movement? These represent only some of the concerns arising. Some might question what the result will be for average civilians in the present situation, with the group persisting to attack its own adversaries and critics.

Recent incidents have yet again highlighted the gaps of Israeli journalism on both sides of the Gazan border. Each source attempts to scrutinize every possible angle of Hamas’s infractions of the ceasefire. And, typically, the fact that the organization has been delaying the repatriation of the bodies of killed Israeli hostages has monopolized the coverage.

Conversely, attention of civilian deaths in the region caused by Israeli operations has garnered scant focus – if at all. Take the Israeli counter strikes following Sunday’s Rafah incident, in which two troops were killed. While local officials reported dozens of casualties, Israeli television pundits complained about the “light response,” which hit solely installations.

That is typical. During the previous weekend, Gaza’s media office charged Israeli forces of infringing the ceasefire with the group multiple occasions after the agreement was implemented, causing the death of dozens of individuals and injuring an additional 143. The assertion appeared irrelevant to most Israeli media outlets – it was just ignored. That included accounts that 11 members of a local family were lost their lives by Israeli soldiers last Friday.

The rescue organization stated the family had been trying to return to their home in the a Gaza City neighbourhood of Gaza City when the bus they were in was targeted for allegedly passing the “demarcation line” that demarcates areas under Israeli army control. This yellow line is not visible to the naked eye and shows up just on plans and in official papers – not always accessible to average residents in the area.

Yet that event hardly received a reference in Israeli media. A major outlet referred to it shortly on its digital site, referencing an Israeli military official who explained that after a questionable car was detected, soldiers fired alerting fire towards it, “but the vehicle persisted to approach the forces in a way that caused an immediate risk to them. The forces engaged to remove the risk, in accordance with the truce.” Zero fatalities were reported.

With this framing, it is understandable many Israeli citizens feel Hamas solely is to blame for breaking the peace. This perception threatens prompting calls for a stronger approach in the region.

Eventually – maybe sooner rather than later – it will not be sufficient for American representatives to take on the role of supervisors, advising the Israeli government what to refrain from. They will {have to|need